Karina Jimenez, Petitioner, v. Martha Gutierrez, Respondent. (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Karina Jimenez, Petitioner, v. Martha Gutierrez, Respondent.

No. 3D22-797

Decided: January 04, 2023

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

Karina Jimenez, in proper person. Martha Gutierrez, in proper person.

We treat Appellant's appeal of the trial court's order denying an emergency motion to stay a writ of possession as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Super Prods., LLC v. Intracoastal Env't, LLC, 252 So. 3d 329, 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) (“Orders staying proceedings are reviewable by certiorari.”); see also Bimini Properties, Inc. v. Puff or Sip Hookah Lounge & Liquor Store, LLC, 343 So. 3d 1249, 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“In these circumstances, we exercise our authority under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c) and treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari.”); Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. Benihana, Inc., 129 So. 3d 1153, 1154 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“This Court has certiorari jurisdiction to review a trial court's non-final order denying a motion for stay.”) (quoting Sorena v. Gerald J. Tobin, P.A., 47 So. 3d 875, 877 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)). Finding the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law, we deny the petition.

Denied.

GORDO, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network