JEFFREY ROGERS v. GRIFFIN COMMERCE CENTER INC VERSATILE WAREHOUSING (2023)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

JEFFREY ROGERS, Appellant, v. GRIFFIN COMMERCE CENTER, INC. d/b/a VERSATILE WAREHOUSING, Appellee.

No. 4D22-1961

Decided: January 04, 2023

Jeffrey Rogers, Dania Beach, pro se. Peter Sobota of Sobota P.L., Davie, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Goodall v. Whispering Woods Ctr., L.L.C., 990 So. 2d 695, 700 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (stating that “[w]hen there are conflicts between the allegations of a complaint and the documents attached as exhibits to the complaint, the plain language of the documents control”); Horizon Images, Inc. v. Delta Color Graphics, Inc., 639 So. 2d 186, 187 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (holding that there must be “a clear intention in the contract between [the contracting parties] to directly and substantially benefit [the third party], in order for [the third party] to sue on the third party beneficiary theory”); Hollywood Lakes Country Club, Inc. v. Cmty. Ass'n Servs., Inc., 770 So. 2d 716, 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding that dismissal of a complaint for breach of contract based on a third party beneficiary theory is warranted where “the contract attached to the complaint shows no intent to directly and substantially benefit” the third party).

PER CURIAM.

GROSS, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network