Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ARGOS USA, LLC f/k/a Argos Ready Mix, LLC, Appellant, v. Patrick FRANKLIN d/b/a Cephas Concrete, Appellee.
Argos USA (“Argos”) filed a complaint against Patrick Franklin d/b/a Cephas Concrete (“Franklin”) seeking payment for concrete goods and services purchased from Argos pursuant to a verbal open account agreement. After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Franklin, concluding that Franklin owed nothing to Argos, which now seeks to reverse that judgment in this appeal.
A review of the evidentiary record shows no basis for the trial court's conclusion that Franklin owed Argos nothing. No matter how the evidence is viewed, it cannot be concluded that Franklin was not liable to Argos in some amount.
To the contrary, Argos presented evidence that Franklin was liable for $259,389.40 worth of goods and services, and that Franklin made payments totaling only $153,929.16, leaving an apparent balance due of $105,460.24. Argos claims entitlement to $118,286.69, which is the balance due plus $12,826.45. The record reflects, however, that a check from Franklin for $12,826.45 bounced and was added back to the balance on the payment reconciliation; as a result, the $12,826.45 claimed is already included in the $105,460.24 total. In addition, Franklin provided bank statements that showed two payments of $295.52 and $1,312.89, which had not been accounted for on the payment reconciliation. Franklin also presented evidence of several check payments, but those payments had already been accounted for on the payment reconciliation. The net result is that the record evidence establishes that Franklin owes Argos $103,851.83, which is the amount on the payment reconciliation ($105,460.24) minus these two payments from Franklin ($295.52 and $1,312.89).
Because the trial court's finding of no liability was against the weight of the evidence, we reverse with instructions to enter judgment in favor of Argos in the amount of $103,851.83 nunc pro tunc to the date of the final judgment and to resolve any other pending claims.
Reversed.
Per Curiam.
B.L. Thomas, Makar, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D20-1981
Decided: August 20, 2021
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)