CHRISTENSEN v. CHRISTENSEN (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Mary Taylor CHRISTENSEN, Former Wife, Appellant, v. Robert L. CHRISTENSEN, Former Husband, and Advertising Services, Inc., Appellees.

No. 1D20-1846

Decided: August 12, 2021

Scott L. Terry of Florin Gray Bouzas Owens, Lutz, and Eric S. Haug of Eric S. Haug Law and Cons., PA, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Anthony C. Bisordi of Bisordi & Bisordi, P.A., Shalimar, for Appellee Robert L. Christensen. No appearance for Appellee Advertising Services, Inc.

Mary Christensen, the former wife, appeals the trial court's post-dissolution final judgment denying her motion for contempt and granting the former husband's petition for modification of alimony. Because the trial court correctly applied the law to the evidence and the former wife failed to show an abuse of the trial court's discretion, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Per Curiam.

B.L. Thomas, Roberts, and Long, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network