POZO v. SUNSET REAL ESTATE PARTNERS (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Guillermo POZO, Appellant, v. SUNSET REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D20-1438

Decided: August 11, 2021

Before HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

Arnaldo Velez, P.A., and Arnaldo Velez, for appellant. Podhurst Orseck, P.A., and Robert C. Josefsberg, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.100(a) (“If an answer or third-party answer contains an affirmative defense and the opposing party seeks to avoid it, the opposing party must file a reply containing the avoidance.” (emphasis added)); § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2020) (providing that the statute of limitations is four years for “[a]ny action not specifically provided for” in the statute); Manatee Cty. v. Mandarin Dev., Inc., 301 So. 3d 372, 375–76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (“Declaratory judgment actions are subject to a four-year statute of limitations.” (citing § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2015))).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network