URBACH v. In re: Guardianship of J.R.U., Appellee. (2021)

Aliza Urbach appeals the trial court's order dismissing with prejudice the petition for guardianship of a minor for improper venue. The presiding judge from the Probate Division reasoned that the proper venue is instead the Family Division ¹ . Because the trial judge erred in dismissing the petition instead of transferring it to the appropriate division, we reverse and remand with instructions to reinstate the petition and leave the issue of transfer to the discretion of the Chief Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit ² . See Burnett v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Mgmt. Co., Inc., 251 So. 3d 223, 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“Filing in the wrong division is not a jurisdictional defect; it is a purely administrative one.”); Weiss v. Courshon, 618 So. 2d 255, 256, n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (“The remedy for filing in the wrong division is transfer to the correct division, rather than dismissal.”); Maugeri v. Plourde, 396 So. 2d 1215, 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (“[E]very judge of the circuit court possesses the full jurisdiction of that court in his of [sic] her circuit and that the various divisions of that court operate in multi-judge circuits for the convenience of the litigants and for the efficiency of the administration of the circuits’ judicial business.”); In re Guardianship of Bentley, 342 So. 2d 1045, 1047 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (“[W]e reverse the order appealed from to the extent that it holds the Probate Division has no jurisdiction to entertain the issue of custody. We remand the cause ․ and, if necessary, the Chief Judge of the Circuit can designate which division of the court shall try the issue.”).

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

FOOTNOTES

1.   We recognize that this case is not about venue, rather, it is about filing a cause of action in the wrong division of the same circuit court.

2.   See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.215(b)(4).

FERNANDEZ, C.J.