STEINBERG v. MARLIN (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Paul STEINBERG, Appellant, v. Robyn MARLIN, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D20-1873

Decided: July 21, 2021

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and GORDO, and LOBREE, JJ.

Scott Jay Feder, P.A., and Scott Jay Feder, for appellant. Bruce S. Rogow, P.A., Bruce S. Rogow, and Tara A. Campion (Cedar Mountain, NC), for appellees.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979); Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co., 81 So. 3d 556, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“Where there is no record of the testimony of witnesses or of evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of the record has not been prepared pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(a)(3) or (b)(3), a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network