JOHNSON v. STATE (2021)

Appellant, Defendant below, David Whitmore Johnson appeals a judgment and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of first-degree murder, attempted first-degree murder, attempted second-degree murder, and the shooting or throwing of a deadly missile. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court reversibly erred in denying Defendant's motion for mistrial. The trial court denied the motion after overruling Defendant's objection to the admission of testimony the State elicited from a witness on cross-examination. This witness testified regarding Defendant bringing an AK-47 assault rifle to the witness's house sometime prior to the shooting incident that precipitated the indictment in this case. Our decision is informed by the abuse of discretion standard of review applicable hereto. See Salazar v. State, 991 So. 2d 364, 373 (Fla. 2008); Hinkson v. State, 283 So. 3d 900, 900–01 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Wellons v. State, 87 So. 3d 1223, 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). Given the record before us, we find no abuse of discretion by the trial judge and are compelled to affirm.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.