Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Delius SHIRLEY, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) v. PROFESSIONAL ROOFING & SALES, INC., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s)
Following review of the “Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Mandamus or Alternatively Petition for Writ of Certiorari,” and the Response and Reply thereto, it is ordered that said Petition is hereby dismissed.
Upon consideration of Respondent's Motion for Appellate Attorney's Fees, it is ordered that said Motion is granted, conditioned upon a determination that Respondent is the prevailing party at the conclusion of the litigation.
Petitioners’ Motion to Tax Attorneys' Fees and Costs is hereby denied.
EMAS, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CASE NO.: 3D21-0852
Decided: June 14, 2021
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)