WHIPPLE v. DAWSON (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Juan WHIPPLE, Appellant, v. Crystal F. DAWSON, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D20-1250

Decided: July 14, 2021

Before SCALES, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.

Juan Whipple, in proper person. William C. Robinson, for appellees.

Affirmed. See Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins, 914 So. 2d 925, 928 (Fla. 2005) (“In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.” (quoting Tillman v. State, 471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985))); Rose v. Clements, 973 So. 2d 529, 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“Any basis for reversal of summary judgment must be preserved by raising the issue in the trial court.”); Rose v. Hansell, 929 So. 2d 22, 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (explaining that appellant is “required to provide an adequate record to support his appeal, and it is his burden to demonstrate error”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network