PALETTI v. CROMER (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Timothy M. PALETTI and the Preece/Paletti Family Foundation, Inc., Appellants, v. Charles J. CROMER, Appellee.

No. 1D20-1031

Decided: July 01, 2021

Timothy M. Paletti, pro se, Appellant. Robert J. Powell of Moorhead Law Group, LLC, Pensacola, for Appellee.

Affirmed. See City of Miami v. Steckloff, 111 So. 2d 446, 447 (Fla. 1959) (“[P]oints covered by a decree of the trial court will not be considered by an appellate court unless they are properly raised and discussed in the briefs.”); Doe v. Baptist Primary Care, Inc., 177 So. 3d 669, 673 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (explaining that an appellant who presents no argument as to why a trial court's ruling is incorrect on an issue has abandoned the issue).

Per Curiam.

Rowe, C.J., and Roberts and Jay, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network