NEWMAN v. AUSTIN (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Alexious G. NEWMAN, Petitioner, v. Tyler K. AUSTIN, Respondent.

No. 1D20-2152

Decided: June 29, 2021

Kansas R. Gooden and Geneva R. Fountain of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner. Aaron Sprague, Daniel A. Iracki, Howard C. Coker, and David C. Thompson, Coker Law, Jacksonville, for Respondent.

DISMISSED. See Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc., 720 So. 2d 214, 215 (Fla. 1998) (“[I]t is settled law that, as a condition precedent to invoking a district court's certiorari jurisdiction, the petitioning party must establish that it has suffered an irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal.”); see also CQB 2010, LLC v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 177 So. 3d 644, 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (refusing to grant certiorari review of order denying discovery because petitioner failed to show that denial would eviscerate its case).

Per Curiam.

B.L. Thomas, Kelsey, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network