BALDWIN v. ZMAN ENTERPRISES LLC LLC LLC (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Chad R. BALDWIN, Appellant, v. ZMAN ENTERPRISES, LLC, Florida Travel Group, LLC, Matthew S. Williams, Professional Travel Center, LLC, Myron S. Williams and Florida Leisure Products, Inc., Appellees.

Case Nos. 5D20-1349, 5D20-1350, 5D20-1351

Decided: June 08, 2021

Chad R. Baldwin, Orlando, pro se. Bradford Petrino, of Korshak & Associates, P.A., Casselberry, for Appellee Florida Travel Group, LLC. No Appearance for Remaining Appellees.

AFFIRMED. See Everidge v. Advantage Venture Partners, Ltd., 880 So. 2d 691, 691 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (“In reviewing the propriety of an order dismissing a complaint, we confine our analysis to the four corners of the complaint and accept all well pled allegations as true.”); see also Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Sunderman, 201 So. 3d 139, 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (“In determining the merits of a motion to dismiss, the trial court must limit itself to the four corners of the complaint.” (citations omitted)); Lewis v. Barnett Bank of S. Fla., N.A., 604 So. 2d 937, 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (“The law is well settled that a motion to dismiss a complaint is not a motion for summary judgment in which the court may rely on facts adduced in depositions, affidavits, or other proofs.”).

PER CURIAM.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network