SMITH v. WILLIAMS (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Quandarius SMITH, Appellant, v. Staci WILLIAMS and Alexis Amoy Bailey, Appellees.

Case No. 5D20-2297

Decided: June 04, 2021

Quandarius Smith, Lawrenceville, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

The father, Quandarius Smith, appeals an order denying his motion for contempt brought against the minor child's temporary custodian, Staci Williams, for alleged interference with visitation. Because the father has not provided this Court with the necessary transcript of the proceedings below, we are precluded from addressing whether the trial court's order was without evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). We must affirm unless the father can demonstrate that “fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order.” Murphy v. Murphy, 948 So. 2d 864, 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). The father has made no such showing in this case.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

EVANDER, C.J., EISNAUGLE and TRAVER, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network