Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert L. FOX, Sr., Appellant, v. TIMEPAYMENT CORP. and Ice Glass Prints Florida, LLC n/k/a Diamond Ice Prints, LLC, Appellees.
AFFIRMED. See Petrysian v. Metro. Gen. Ins., 672 So. 2d 562, 563 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (“A change in the applicable rule of law resulting from a later appellate decision in an unrelated case is not a ground [under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)] to vacate a final order.” (citing Theisen v. Old Republic Ins., 468 So. 2d 434, 435 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985))); Williams v. Skylink Jets, Inc., 229 So. 3d 1275, 1279 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (recognizing that a final judgment rendered without notice to the defaulting party remains valid as to any claim for liquidated damages).
PER CURIAM.
COHEN, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case No. 5D20-2143
Decided: May 25, 2021
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)