Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GREGORIAN INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Alejandro Enrique Delfino THORMAHLEN, etc., Appellee.
Celestino Martinez, a Venezuelan citizen who resides in Broward County, Florida, appeals the dismissal of his complaint against Alejandro Enrique Delfino Thormahlen on the basis of forum non conveniens. The lower court granted the motion, in favor of conducting the litigation in Venezuela, without holding an evidentiary hearing.1
The standard of review on dismissal of a complaint on the basis of forum non conveniens is abuse of discretion. See Fla. R. Civ. P 1.061(a); Abeid-Saba v. Carnival Corp., 184 So. 3d 593, 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). “The burden of proof of each element in the forum non conveniens analysis is on the [d]efendants.” Publicidad Vepaco, C.A. v. Mezerhane, 176 So. 3d 273, 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (citing Telemundo Network Grp., LLC v. Azteca Int'l Corp., 957 So. 2d 705, 709 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)). “The first of the four [Kinney] factors is the availability of an adequate alternative forum. As explained in Cortez, ‘[t]his factor encompasses two separate considerations: availability and adequacy.’ ” Id. at 276 (quoting Cortez v. Palace Resorts, Inc., 123 So. 3d 1085, 1091 (Fla. 2013)); see also Kinney Sys. v. Cont'l Ins. Co., 674 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1996).
Because the record demonstrates disputed issues of fact as to the “adequacy” of the Venezuelan forum, we reverse and remand for the lower court to conduct an evidentiary hearing and make factual findings regarding this factor so that this Court may have a sufficient record from which to conduct its review.
Reversed and remanded.
FOOTNOTES
1. Gregorian International, Inc., was a named plaintiff only on Count I (Declaratory Judgment). Before briefs were filed and oral argument was held, the parties resolved Count I by agreeing to a stipulated final judgment as to that count only. Consequently, Gregorian is not a party to the appeal, and the only remaining counts in the amended complaint are Count II (Tortious Interference with Advantageous Business Relationships) and Count III (Defamation Per Se).
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D19-2272
Decided: April 28, 2021
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)