TARANTOLA v. HENGHOLD (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Cristina TARANTOLA, M.D., Appellant, v. William B. HENGHOLD, M.D., P.A., Appellee.

No. 1D19-2844

Decided: August 12, 2020

Chris K. Ritchie and Todd M. LaDouceur of Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith, P.L.C., Pensacola, for Appellant. Daniel E. Harrell and Jeremy C. Branning of Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond & Stackhouse, Pensacola, for Appellee.

This Court has determined the appeal must be dismissed because the order on appeal is not an appealable partial final judgment under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k). See Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So. 2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“An order is not an appealable partial final order where there is a factual overlap between the pending claims and the claims resolved by the order.”).

Dismissed.

Per Curiam.

Lewis, Roberts, and Makar, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network