SAPEG v. STATE (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Juan Jose SAPEG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D20-1104

Decided: July 21, 2020

Juan Jose Sapeg, Sanford, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

AFFIRMED. See Jackman v. State, 88 So. 3d 325, 327 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (concluding that a trial court is without jurisdiction to consider the merits of a successive motion while a related appeal is pending but may “determine that the motion is procedurally barred and may dismiss the motion as successive or untimely”).

PER CURIAM.

EISNAUGLE, GROSSHANS, and TRAVER, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network