Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert L. BURNS, Jr., Appellant, v. Valorie M. HOUK, Appellee.
Robert L. Burns, Jr., appeals the order denying his motion to temporarily suspend a timesharing plan and finding him in contempt of court for violating the plan. We affirm in all respects, with one exception. Because the contempt order awards attorney's fees but does not determine the amount of fees, judicial labor has not ended, and the order is not ripe for review. Accordingly, this Court is without jurisdiction to review the order on contempt, and we therefore dismiss the appeal as to this issue. See Nathanson v. Rishyko, 140 So. 3d 1054, 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Rushing v. Rushing, 132 So. 3d 923 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.
PER CURIAM.
EISNAUGLE and SASSO, JJ., and TAKAC, M., Associate Judge, concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case No. 5D19-548
Decided: June 05, 2020
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)