JOSE SAPEG v. STATE (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Juan JOSE SAPEG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D20-898

Decided: May 22, 2020

Juan Jose Sapeg, Sanford, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

We affirm, without further discussion, the postconviction court's denial of Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. See Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238, 243 (Fla. 2007) (holding that for motions filed under rule 3.800(a), any error in the scoresheet is harmless if the trial court could have imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet). We remand, however, for the court to enter a corrected scoresheet to show that Appellant's conviction on count one was for a level eight offense and that his conviction on count nine was for a level four offense.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

PER CURIAM.

LAMBERT, GROSSHANS, and SASSO, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network