Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CDC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, as Trustee, Appellant, v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Appellee.
We find that the trial court erred in granting summary final judgment of foreclosure, as Appellee failed to properly prove amounts due by competent substantial evidence. See Clay Cty. Land Tr. No. 08-04-25-0078-014-27, Orange Park Tr. Servs., LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 152 So. 3d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (reversing summary judgment where the affidavit establishing the amount due relied on business records from the prior owner of the note and there was no showing the affiant was familiar with the prior business’s practices or had verified the accuracy of the records). See also Hunter v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 137 So. 3d 570, 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (finding error in admitting computer-generated documents offered through a loan services employee who was not an employee of original mortgage holder, lacked personal knowledge of original holder’s record-keeping procedures, and was unable to substantiate when the records were made, whether the information they contained derived from a person with knowledge, whether original owner regularly made such records, or whether the records belonged to original owner); Channell v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l. Tr. Co., 173 So. 3d 1017, 1019 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (holding that where a “business takes custody of another business’s records and integrates them within its own records, the acquired records are treated as having been ‘made’ by the successor business, such that both records constitute the successor business’s singular ‘business record.’ ” (citing Bank of N.Y. v. Calloway, 157 So. 3d 1064, 1071 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015))).*
We reverse only as to the judgment amount and remand for further proceedings to establish that amount. The order under review is otherwise affirmed.
Affirmed in part, Reversed in part and Remanded.
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE. We have considered and rejected Appellee’s argument that Appellant had no standing to challenge the foreclosure. See, e.g., Green Emerald Homes, LLC v. 21st Mortgage Corp., 44 Fla. L. Weekly D1449, ––– So.3d ––––, 2019 WL 2398015 (Fla. 2d DCA June 7, 2019).
Per Curiam.
Lewis, Makar, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D18-4422
Decided: May 08, 2020
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)