PRINCE v. GONZALEZ (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Edduard PRINCE, Appellant, v. Raymond GONZALEZ and American Shuttle, Inc., Appellees.

No. 3D19-1879

Decided: January 02, 2020

Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER and SCALES, JJ.

Edduard Prince, in proper person. Michael A. Pancier, P.A., and Michael A. Pancier (Pembroke Pines), for appellees.

Affirmed. See Gilman + Ciocia, Inc. v. Wetherald, 885 So. 2d 900, 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (recognizing that the arbitration “exemption provided in [9 U.S.C.] § 1 [is] limited to the types of workers enumerated in the provision (transportation workers), and [is] further limited to transportation workers engaged in the actual movement of goods in interstate commerce”); Donmoor, Inc. v. Sturtevant, 449 So. 2d 869, 871 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (concluding that a worker must be “involved in, or closely related to, the actual movement of goods in interstate commerce” for the arbitration exemption set forth in 9 U.S.C. § 1 to apply).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network