PAYLAN v. GOUDIE (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Christina PAYLAN, M.D., Appellant, v. Lyann GOUDIE, Esq. and Goudie & Kohn, P.A., Appellees.

Case No. 2D19-1805

Decided: January 03, 2020

Christina Paylan, M.D., pro se. Elizabeth C. Tosh and Daniel A. Shapiro of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees.

Christina Paylan, M.D., challenges a nonfinal injunctive sanction order finding her to be a vexatious litigant and subject to prefiling requirements for future actions. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(c) (“If a party seeks an improper remedy, the cause shall be treated as if the proper remedy had been sought ․”); Harris v. Gattie, 263 So. 3d 829, 830 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (treating notice of appeal of order forbidding Harris from filing further pro se papers in the case and any other future case as a petition for writ of certiorari), and we deny the petition.

Petition denied.

PER CURIAM.

CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network