MICHELLE PIMIENTA v. DAVID ABRAHAM ROSENFELD (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MICHELLE PIMIENTA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DAVID ABRAHAM ROSENFELD, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D22-1435

Decided: September 02, 2022

Upon consideration, pro se Petitioner's “Motion to Reinstate Notice of Writ of Mandamus and Allow Petitioner to File Initial Brief or Accept this Motion as the [Petitioner's] Initial Brief” is treated as a motion for rehearing of the Court's August 29, 2022, dismissal Order. Said motion for rehearing is hereby denied.

Pro se Petitioner is again cautioned that the filing of petitions without legal basis may result in sanctions, including but not limited to, an order barring pro se Petitioner from filing documents in this Court without the signature of a member of the Florida Bar.

FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and SCALES, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network