Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John Calvin GERMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
John Calvin German appeals a circuit court order that denied his motion to correct illegal sentence and vacated an earlier order granting resentencing. We reverse and remand for reinstatement of the earlier order because the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to vacate it.
Appellant was convicted of home invasion robbery with a firearm and attempted sexual battery with threat of great force. The trial court sentenced him in 2008 to fifty years in prison for the robbery with a ten-year mandatory minimum and fifteen years for the attempted sexual battery. This court affirmed in German v. State, 27 So. 3d 130, 131 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). In a rule 3.800(a) motion, appellant challenged his fifty-year sentence under Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010). The state conceded appellant was entitled to resentencing under the provisions of chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida. The circuit court granted appellant's motion, ordering that he was entitled to a resentencing hearing. The state did not appeal.
Later, this court issued Hart v. State, 246 So. 3d 417, 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018), review granted, SC18-967, 2018 WL 4614150 (Fla. Sept. 7, 2018), and case dismissed, SC18-967, 2018 WL 6181698 (Fla. Nov. 27, 2018), holding that a juvenile defendant's thirty-year sentence for non-homicide offenses did not violate the Eighth Amendment or Graham. This led the state to file in the circuit court a supplemental response and motion to strike or stay the resentencing hearing. The circuit court agreed with the state, vacated its earlier order granting resentencing, and denied the motion to correct illegal sentence.
The order granting resentencing became final and non-appealable when neither party moved for rehearing or appealed. See Jones v. State, 279 So.3d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019); Simmons v. State, 274 So. 3d 468, 470-71 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019). After that, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to vacate that order.
We reverse the order on appeal and remand for the circuit court to reinstate its original order granting resentencing. The trial court should resentence appellant to a lawful sentence on remand, based on the controlling law at the time of resentencing. See Jones, 279 So.3d 172. We decline to address the substantive challenges appellant raises as to the current sentencing law.
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
Per Curiam.
Ciklin, Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 4D18-3635
Decided: November 13, 2019
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)