BRANHAM v. STATE (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

James Mark BRANHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-744

Decided: October 23, 2019

Mark H. Klein of MHK Legal, PLLC, Coral Springs, for appellant. No appearance required for appellee.

The order dismissing Appellant's amended motion for postconviction relief as untimely is affirmed. Appellant's argument that the untimely filing should be excused because he retained an attorney who failed to timely file the amendment was not raised below and is not preserved for appeal. The proper avenue for presenting such a claim is through a sworn filing in the trial court, which can conduct an evidentiary hearing on the issue if necessary. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b)(3); Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 1999). Within the time remaining under the rule, Appellant may file a properly sworn motion in the trial court seeking leave to belatedly file the amended motion pursuant to rule 3.850(b)(3) and Steele.

Affirmed without prejudice.

Per Curiam.

Levine, C.J., Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network