STATE v. MELLACI (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Austin Chase MELLACI, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-835

Decided: October 25, 2019

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Michael T. McGinn, and Corey I. Cohen, of Law Office of Corey I. Cohen, Orlando, for Appellee.

The State appeals the trial court's order granting Austin Melacci's motion to dismiss. We agree with the State that the trial court erred when it attempted to divine the officer's reason for making the traffic stop in this case. See Holland v. State, 696 So. 2d 757, 759 (Fla. 1997) (“[A]pplying the objective test, generally the only determination to be made is whether probable cause existed for the stop in question.”). Here, the officer testified that he stopped Melacci after observing him weaving across several lanes of rush hour traffic and causing nearby drivers to brake and take other evasive measures. The evidence showed that the officer had probable cause to believe that Melacci had committed one or more traffic violations. The trial court's finding that the stop was pretextual is not supported by the evidence, and it was error to grant the motion to suppress based on that finding. Therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HARRIS, J.

COHEN and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law