ANCRUM v. STATE (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Terrence Eugene ANCRUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1639

Decided: October 21, 2019

Terrence Eugene Ancrum, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Terrance Eugene Ancrum appeals the summary denial of his motion for correction of jail credit filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. Because a claim for jail credit beyond the amount agreed to in a plea bargain is not cognizable in a rule 3.801 proceeding, we affirm. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045, 1052 (Fla. 2011) (holding that challenges to plea agreement provisions regarding jail credit are not cognizable under the rule providing a mechanism for correcting the improper denial of credit for time served; such challenges must be raised in a motion challenging the voluntariness of the plea); see also Barnette v. State, 205 So. 3d 865 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016); Romero v. State, 176 So. 3d 1282 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); Hale v. State, 174 So. 3d 1103 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Affirmed.

Per Curiam.

Ray, C.J., and B.L. Thomas and Winokur, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network