Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jimmy STEPHENS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
Jimmy Stephens appeals an order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus. He claims that the filing of his petition was timely under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, and that the trial court erred in dismissing his action without holding an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether Stephens received the response to his grievance appeal (it appears to have been sent to the incorrect facility). Because a disputed issue of fact exists, the dismissal of Stephens' petition is erroneous, see Owens v. Crews, 131 So. 3d 799 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), and we remand for an evidentiary hearing.
Reverse and Remand for further proceedings.
Per Curiam.
Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D18-3512
Decided: October 01, 2019
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)