REID v. STATE (2019)

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Cim. P. 3.850(c) (“This rule does not authorize relief based on grounds that could have or should have been raised at trial and, if properly preserved, on direct appeal of the judgment and sentence.”); Deparvine v. State, 995 So. 2d 351, 374 (Fla. 2008) (noting that where the “indictment placed [the defendant] on express notice that he was charged with a violation of the first-degree murder statute set out in section 782.04(1), Florida Statutes ․ there was [no] ․ complete omission of an essential element and the indictment was not so vague as to mislead or prejudice [the defendant] or so fundamentally defective that it [could not] support a judgment of conviction”); see also Hillman v. State, 410 So. 2d 180, 181 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982) (finding that “two robberies of different people at the same time are two separate offenses calling for two judgments and two sentences”).

PER CURIAM.