ROBINSON v. STATE (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sherfronski ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-1279

Decided: September 25, 2019

Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ.

Sherfronski Robinson, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); “The defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”) see also Hurst v. State, 18 So. 3d 975, 996 (Fla. 2009) (“The Court need not reach both Strickland prongs in every case. ‘[W]hen a defendant fails to make a showing as to one prong, it is not necessary to delve into whether he has made a showing as to the other prong.’ ” quoting Preston v. State, 970 So. 2d 789, 803 (Fla. 2007)).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network