Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Teddy JOSEPH, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT o/b/o Ollie Collins, Appellee.
CONFESSION OF ERROR
Teddy Joseph challenges the Department of Revenue's administrative support order entered in a proceeding under section 409.2563, Florida Statutes (2018). This court has jurisdiction to review the Department's order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(C). Because the Department properly concedes error in providing Joseph proper notice, we reverse.
After initiating child support proceedings against Joseph, the Department created its proposed support order and sent it to Joseph at his previous address in Hialeah despite having his current address in Homestead on file. The proposed order listed Joseph's monthly child support obligation amounts and indicated that if he disagreed with the listed amounts, he should request a hearing. See § 409.2563(5). The order further indicated that it would become final if Joseph failed to request a hearing or otherwise respond. See § 409.2563(7). The Department finalized the proposed order when Joseph failed to respond. See id.
On appeal, Joseph claims he did not receive the Department's proposed order or final order. The Department concedes that the proposed order was sent to the incorrect address. See Little v. D'Aloia, 759 So. 2d 17, 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (“We hold that where the City had actual knowledge of the correct mailing address ․ and failed to provide the notice of hearing to [the] correct address, it failed to comply with the due process requirements.”). Therefore, we order that the Department's final administrative support order be vacated and remand the case for an administrative hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
Per Curiam.
Conner, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D19-487
Decided: September 25, 2019
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)