SCHMIEDEKER v. JENSEN (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Adam SCHMIEDEKER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Danielle JENSEN, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D19-0666

Decided: August 28, 2019

Following review of appellee's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and the response thereto, it is ordered that the above-styled appeal is hereby dismissed as an untimely appeal of a non-final order. See Deal v. Deal, 783 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Upon consideration of appellee's motion for attorney's fees, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied. See Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432 (1991).

SCALES, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network