SCHWEIZER v. SCHWEIZER (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

W. Todd SCHWEIZER, Petitioner, v. Melanie SCHWEIZER, Respondent.

No. 1D19-2463

Decided: September 09, 2019

Ross A. Keene of Ross Keene Law, P.A., Pensacola, for Petitioner. Michael T. Webster of Michael T. Webster, P.A., Shalimar, for Respondent.

The order under review does not preclude Petitioner from responding to a motion for contempt and sanctions, nor does it preclude a future hearing on sanctions and determination of contempt. No ruling has yet been made on contempt or sanctions, and Petitioner will have avenues of review for any future orders on contempt or sanctions. Therefore, Petitioner has not demonstrated irreparable harm, and we dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari for lack of jurisdiction. See Landmark at Crescent Ridge LP v. Everest Financial, Inc., 219 So. 3d 218, 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (explaining that where the threshold requirement of irreparable harm is not established, the petition for writ of certiorari must be dismissed).

Per Curiam.

B.L. Thomas, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network