PREFERRED HEALTH WELLNESS INC v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

PREFERRED HEALTH & WELLNESS, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 3D19-1464

Decided: September 11, 2019

Before SALTER, MILLER, and GORDO, JJ.

Buchalter, Hoffman & Dorchak, P.A. and Kenneth Dorchak; North Miami, Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A. and Chad A. Barr, (Altamonte Springs), for petitioner. Michael J. Neimand, for respondent.

Denied. Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 62 So. 3d 1086, 1092 (Fla. 2010) (“The departure from the essential requirements of the law necessary for granting a writ of certiorari is something more than a simple legal error. Rather, a district court should exercise its discretion to grant review only when the lower tribunal has violated a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice.”) (internal citation omitted); Ivey v. Allstate Ins. Co., 774 So. 2d 679, 682 (Fla. 2000) (“It is well-established that certiorari should not be used as a vehicle for a second appeal in a typical case tried in county court.”) (citation omitted).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network