Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Darrell Lamar BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Affirmed. See Bartz v. State, 740 So. 2d 1243, 1245 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (challenge to guilty plea raised twenty-one years thereafter barred by laches for lack of due diligence; claim that defendant was not told of collateral consequences of plea in event of his recidivism did not excuse procedural default).
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D19-1332
Decided: August 21, 2019
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)