CONTINENTAL MOTORS INC v. ROSENTHAL (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., Appellant, v. Karen ROSENTHAL, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-2543

Decided: August 14, 2019

Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., and Alyssa M. Reiter (Fort Lauderdale) and Giovanna Abreu O'Connor (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant. Dewsnup King Olsen Worel Havas Mortensen, and Paul M. Simmons (Salt Lake City, Utah); Roberts, P.A., and H. Clay Roberts, for appellees.

Affirmed. See Fla. Prob. R. 5.460(a) (providing: “If, after an estate is closed, additional property of the decedent is discovered or if further administration of the estate is required for any other reason, any interested person may file a petition for further administration of the estate. The petition shall be filed in the same probate file as the original administration”); Mathis v. Estate of Mathis, 178 So. 3d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (applying abuse of discretion standard in reviewing probate court's order on motion for subsequent administration pursuant to rule 5.460).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network