Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Charles TAVARES, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. 139TH AVENUE S.W. 8TH STREET, LLC, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
Upon consideration, appellant's pro se motion to vacate and second motion for rehearing, and clarification are hereby denied.
Appellant's pro se second motion for rehearing en banc is denied.
SALTER, FERNANDEZ and HENDON, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CASE NO.: 3D19-0249
Decided: May 29, 2019
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)