RICHARDSON v. STATE (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jerome RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4811

Decided: July 03, 2019

Jerome Richardson, pro se.

Affirmed. See Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 2007); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Waiter v. State, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Carpenter v. State, 884 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Vidak v. State, 793 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Haynes v. State, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013); Allen v. State, 976 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Williams v. State, 907 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Paul v. State, 830 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

PER CURIAM.

KHOUZAM, C.J., and SLEET and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network