DELLANO v. STATE (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rolando DELLANO, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D19-939

Decided: May 29, 2019

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ.

Rolando Dellano, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for respondent.

The petitioner, Rolando Dellano, filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus, seeking issuance of a writ compelling the circuit court judge to rule on his “Motion to Withdraw Plea After Resentencing,” which the petitioner dated on June 27, 2018. Following our review of the lower tribunal docket and the information provided by the petitioner, we deny the Petition for Writ of Mandamus as it appears that the petitioner has not actually filed the Motion to Withdraw Plea After Sentencing as a separate docket entry.¹

Denied.

FOOTNOTES

1. The lower tribunal docket indicates that the petitioner has filed several motions seeking to withdraw/vacate his plea, but none are titled “Motion to Withdraw Plea After Resentencing” or were filed on or after June 27, 2018. Further, the copy of the Motion to Withdraw Plea After Sentencing that the petitioner has attached to his Petition for Writ of Mandamus was actually included as an exhibit in other filings, not as a separate docket entry.

HENDON, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network