EPHRON v. STATE (2019)

In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the orders revoking Appellant's probation and imposing sentence. However, we remand for the entry of a corrected revocation of probation order specifying that Appellant only admitted to violating Condition 1 of his probation. See Bussie v. State, 263 So.3d 229, 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (affirming the revocation of the appellant's probation and the resulting sentence in the Anders appeal but remanding for the trial court to enter a corrected written order specifying that the appellant only admitted to violating the conditions of probation as alleged in the affidavit of violation of probation); Altman v. State, 252 So.3d 426, 426 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (affirming the revocation of the appellant's probation and the resulting sentence in the Anders appeal but remanding for the trial court to enter a corrected written order specifying that the appellant only admitted to violating the conditions of probation as alleged in grounds I through X of the fourth amended affidavit of violation of probation); Margolis v. State, 148 So.3d 532, 532 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (affirming the revocation of probation and sentence in the Anders appeal but remanding for entry of a corrected order accurately reflecting the conditions of probation the appellant admitted to violating).

Affirmed but Remanded for correction.

Per Curiam.

Lewis, Winsor, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.