PLUMER II v. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Richard PLUMER II, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D18-2207

Decided: May 22, 2019

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and MILLER JJ.

Richard Plumer II, in proper person. McGlinchey Stafford, and Charles E. Stoecker, and William L. Grimsley (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Affirmed. See Plumer, II v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 250 So.3d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); see also Bueno v. Bueno de Khawly, 677 So.2d 3, 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (The “doctrine [of law of the case states] that those points of law adjudicated in a prior appeal are binding in order to promote stability of judicial decisions and to avoid piecemeal litigation.” (citation omitted)); Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher, 656 So.2d 178, 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (“A per curiam decision of the appellate court is the law of the case between the same parties on the same issues and facts, and determines all issues necessarily involved in the appeal, whether mentioned in the court's opinion or not.” (citation omitted)).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network