COUPERTHWAITE v. COUPERTHWAITE (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Rina Genise COUPERTHWAITE, n/k/a Rina Genise Pollock, Former Wife, Appellant, v. David W. COUPERTHWAITE, Former Husband, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3770

Decided: May 06, 2019

Bradley G. Johnson, Milton, for Appellant. J. Rod Cameron, Pace, for Appellee.

Appellant challenges the final order denying her petition to relocate with the minor child, pursuant to section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2017). The portion of the trial court's order modifying the timesharing schedule, as made necessary by Appellant's permanent relocation to another state, is not appealed. To the extent the issues were preserved for appellate review, we find that the trial court applied the correct law and Appellant fails to demonstrate an abuse of the trial court's discretion. The order denying petition to relocate with minor child but modifying the timesharing schedule is thus Affirmed. See Ness v. Martinez, 249 So.3d 754, 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018); Rossman v. Profera, 67 So.3d 363, 367 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Per Curiam.

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network