CRANDALL DOC T94085 v. STATE (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jasmine CRANDALL, DOC #T94085, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2721

Decided: April 24, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

We affirm the revocation of Ms. Crandall's probation and the resultant sentence without comment. Because the written sentence contains a single designation of credit (“Credit for Time Served: 72 Days (INCLUDING PRIOR PRISON CREDIT)”) without delineating the jail credit to which she is entitled from the prison credit that the trial court also awarded, we remand only for the limited purpose of the entry of a new written sentence distinguishing between the jail and prison credit awards and clarifying that the calculation of the prison credit is to be calculated by the Department of Corrections. See Rowan v. State, 779 So.2d 417, 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (“This appears to be a scrivener's error that combines jail and prison credit․ The trial court need not calculate prison credit so long as the trial court checks the standard box allowing all appropriate prior prison credit.”).

Affirmed; remanded.

PER CURIAM.

SILBERMAN, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network