DIPASQUALE v. DIPASQUALE (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Bruno DIPASQUALE, Appellant, v. Lisette DIPASQUALE, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2266

Decided: April 24, 2019

Raymond J. Rafool and David R. Hazouri of Rafool, LLC, Miami, for Appellant. Cynthia B. Hall of Silveri & Ball, P.A., Naples, for Appellee.

In this consolidated appeal, Bruno DiPasquale appeals from the final judgment dissolving his marriage to Lisette DiPasquale and from the order denying his motion to modify the parties' partial marital settlement agreement (PMSA). We affirm without prejudice to Mr. DiPasquale asserting the arguments he has raised in this appeal in a subsequent petition for modification. Cf. Dogoda v. Dogoda, 233 So.3d 484, 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (“In cases involving an MSA, the effective date of the agreement establishes the date to which a trial court should look in determining whether a substantial change in circumstances was contemplated by the parties.”).

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network