GARCIA v. IGLESIAS (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rigoberto Iglesias GARCIA, Appellant, v. Osiris Melo IGLESIAS, Appellee.

No. 3D18-0187

Decided: March 20, 2019

Before SALTER, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ.

Odalys Sanchez Elkins, for appellant. Osiris Melo Iglesias, in proper person.

Affirmed. See § 741.30(6), Fla. Stat. (2018); Jeffries v. Jeffries, 133 So.3d 1243, 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (“It was the responsibility of the trial court to determine the credibility of the witnesses and to resolve the conflicts in the evidence.”) (citing Disston v. Hanson, 116 So.3d 612, 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (“Because there is competent substantial evidence in the record to support the injunction, we affirm. While the evidence was in sharp contrast, the credibility of the witness is within the trial court’s exclusive purview.”) ); Abravaya v. Gonzalez, 734 So.2d 577, 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (“[Appellee’s] testimony, alone, sufficed to support the issuance of the instant injunction.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network