Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Thomas L. TILLMAN, DOC #487531, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
A jury found Thomas L. Tillman guilty of attempted second-degree murder with a firearm. See §§ 782.04(2), 777.04(1), (4)(c), 775.087(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015). On appeal from the judgment, Tillman argues, among other things, that the 2017 amendment to section 776.032, Florida Statutes, see ch. 2017-72, § 1, Laws of Fla.—Florida's “Stand Your Ground” law—applies retroactively and that in light of that amendment, the trial court should reconsider his motion to dismiss the information based on that statute.
As we did in Martin v. State, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1016, D1017, ––– So.3d ––––, ––––, 2018 WL 2074171 (Fla. 2d DCA May 4, 2018), review pending, No. SC18-789, we hold that the 2017 amendment to section 766.032 is procedural in nature and is retroactively applicable to pending cases. See also Drossos v. State, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D2764, ––– So.3d ––––, 2018 WL 6579755 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 14, 2018), review pending, No. SC19-83. And as we did in Martin, we reverse Tillman's judgment and sentence and remand for a new immunity hearing under the 2017 statute. If, following the hearing, the trial court determines that Tillman is entitled to statutory immunity, “it shall enter an order to that effect and dismiss the information with prejudice.” Martin, 43 Fla. L. Weekly at D1018, ––– So3d at ––––. If the trial court determines that Tillman is not entitled to immunity, it shall enter an order so reflecting and reinstate Tillman's conviction and sentence. See id. We affirm without comment with regard to the remaining issues that Tillman has raised in this appeal.
The Third and Fourth District Courts of Appeal have held that section 766.032, as amended, does not apply retroactively in pending cases, and we therefore certify conflict with Hight v. State, 253 So.3d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018), review pending, No. SC18-1653, and Love v. State, 247 So.3d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018), review granted, No. SC18-747, 2018 WL 3147946 (Fla. June 26, 2018).
Reversed and remanded with instructions; conflict certified.
PER CURIAM.
VILLANTI, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case No. 2D16-5566
Decided: March 13, 2019
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)