CAMPANHAC v. LAURAMORE (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Noel B. CAMPANHAC, Appellant, v. Riley LAURAMORE, Appellee.
Noel B. Campanhac, Appellant, v. Beverly Lauramore, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1001, Case No. 5D18-1002

Decided: March 08, 2019

Eric J. Friday, of Kingry & Friday, Jacksonville, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellees.

Appellant, Noel Campanhac, appeals the trial court's final judgments of injunction for protection against stalking in these related cases,¹ arguing that there was insufficient evidence of stalking to support the injunctions. After considering the limited testimony and evidence presented below and without the benefit of briefs or any appearance by Appellees, we agree with Appellant that there was no competent, substantial evidence to support a finding of stalking. See Packal v. Johnson, 226 So.3d 337, 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (holding that each incident of stalking must be proven by competent, substantial evidence to support injunction against stalking). Accordingly, we reverse the injunction.

REVERSED.

FOOTNOTES

1. This Court has consolidated these cases for purposes of this opinion only.

HARRIS, J.

LAMBERT and SASSO, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network