LEHNING v. STATE (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Christopher LEHNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3236

Decided: February 20, 2019

Christopher Lehning, pro se.

Affirmed. See Carbajal v. State, 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011); Bradley v. State, 787 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 2001); Hendrix v. State, 637 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 1994); DuBoise v. State, 520 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1988); State v. King, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982); Lehning v. State, 158 So. 3d 580 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (table decision); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Coughlin v. State, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (en banc); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Desmond v. State, 576 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Budd v. State, 477 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); McMillan v. State, 832 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Kaufman v. State, 696 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

PER CURIAM.

KELLY, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network