STEWART v. STATE (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Naim STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 1D16-3644, 1D16-3646

Decided: February 05, 2019

Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

In these Anders ^* appeals, we affirm the orders revoking Appellant's probation and imposing sentence. However, we remand for correction of the written orders of revocation to specify the conditions Appellant was found to have violated. See Davis v. State, 218 So.3d 507 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (affirming revocation of probation in Anders appeal but remanding for court to enter written revocation order specifying conditions of probation violated). Appellant need not be present. See Williams v. State, 145 So.3d 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Affirmed and Remanded.

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Per Curiam.

Roberts, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network